🔗 Share this article

The respite resulting from the end of fighting in Gaza is substantial. Across Israel, the release of surviving detainees has led to extensive joy. In Gaza and the West Bank, celebrations have commenced as approximately 2,000 Palestinian prisoners start to be released – even as distress remains due to doubt about which prisoners are returning and where they will be sent. Throughout Gaza's northern regions, people can finally reenter search the debris for the bodies of an believed 10,000 those who have disappeared.

Truce Development Against Earlier Odds

Only three weeks ago, the probability of a ceasefire seemed unlikely. Yet it has come into force, and on Monday Donald Trump travelled from Jerusalem, where he was cheered in the Knesset, to Sharm el-Sheikh in Egypt. There, he participated in a prestigious peace conference of in excess of 20 world leaders, among them Sir Keir Starmer. The diplomatic roadmap initiated there is set to advance at a assembly in the UK. The US president, working alongside international partners, did make this deal happen – contrary to, not because of, Israel’s prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Palestinian Statehood Hopes Moderated by Previous Experiences

Aspirations that the deal marks the opening phase toward Palestinian statehood are comprehensible – but, given previous instances, rather hopeful. It provides no definite route to independence for Palestinians and risks dividing, for the immediate period, Gaza from the West Bank. Furthermore the total ruin this war leaves behind. The absence of any schedule for Palestinian self-determination in the presidential proposal gives the lie to vainglorious references, in his Knesset speech, to the “monumental start” of a “era of prosperity”.

The US president could not resist dividing and personalising the deal in his speech.

In a time of respite – with the hostage release, truce and restart of aid – he chose to recast it as a morality play in which he solely reinstated Israel’s prestige after alleged betrayal by former US presidents Obama and Biden. Notwithstanding the Biden administration twelve months prior having undertaken a similar deal: a ceasefire tied to relief entry and future political talks.

Meaningful Agency Crucial for Legitimate Peace

A proposal that withholds one side meaningful agency cannot yield authentic resolution. The halt in hostilities and relief shipments are to be embraced. But this is not currently political progress. Without systems ensuring Palestinian participation and command over their own establishments, any deal endangers cementing oppression under the discourse of peace.

Relief Imperatives and Reconstruction Challenges

Gaza’s people crucially depend on emergency support – and nutrition and medication must be the initial concern. But reconstruction must not be delayed. Within 60 million tonnes of rubble, Palestinians need assistance reconstructing homes, educational facilities, medical centers, religious buildings and other organizations devastated by Israel’s invasion. For Gaza’s transitional administration to prosper, funding must arrive promptly and security gaps be addressed.

Similar to much of Mr Trump’s diplomatic proposal, references to an multinational security contingent and a recommended “diplomatic committee” are alarmingly vague.

Global Backing and Prospective Outcomes

Strong international support for the Gaza's governing body, permitting it to replace Hamas, is perhaps the most encouraging possibility. The enormous suffering of the recent period means the ethical argument for a solution to the conflict is possibly more urgent than ever. But even as the truce, the repatriation of the captives and pledge by Hamas to “remove weapons from” Gaza should be acknowledged as constructive moves, the president's track record offers minimal cause to believe he will deliver – or deem himself compelled to endeavor. Short-term relief should not be interpreted as that the possibility of a Palestinian state has been moved nearer.