🔗 Share this article

Per a fresh examination, scores of people having histories in the energy sector have been appointed within the existing leadership, featuring over 40 who formerly worked straight for coal firms.

Context of the Study

This report analyzed the histories of candidates and personnel working in the White House and several national agencies handling climate matters. Those include important organizations such as the EPA, the interior agency, and the energy office.

Larger Policy Climate

This review surfaces while ongoing actions to weaken environmental rules and renewable energy programs. For example, new legislation have unlocked large areas of government land for drilling and eliminated funding for clean power.

Amid the flood of bad actions that have transpired on the climate front... it’s important to remind the citizens that these are not just actions from the amorphous, massive thing that is the administration broadly, said one author involved in the report. It is commonly specific players coming from certain wealthy groups that are carrying out this harmful anti-regulatory plan.

Major Discoveries

Analysts found 111 staff whom they classified as fossil fuel insiders and clean energy critics. That encompasses 43 officials who were previously serving by gas enterprises. Included in them are well-known senior executives including the energy secretary, who earlier served as chief executive of a fracking firm.

This group also features lower-profile government staff. For example, the department overseeing energy efficiency is managed by a ex- gas executive. In the same vein, a senior policy consultant in the executive office has occupied high-ranking jobs at prominent petroleum corporations.

Additional Connections

An additional 12 officials possess ties to energy-financed conservative research groups. Those include ex- employees and fellows of entities that have vigorously opposed alternative sources and championed the continuation of conventional sources.

Additionally 29 other appointees are previous corporate leaders from heavy industry industries whose operations are closely connected to fossil fuels. Other officials have connections with power providers that market traditional energy or elected representatives who have pushed pro-coal initiatives.

Departmental Emphasis

Analysts found that 32 personnel at the Interior Department individually have links to extractive sectors, establishing it as the most influenced federal department. That features the secretary of the agency, who has consistently taken industry donations and served as a bridge between oil and gas sector contributors and the administration.

Campaign Finance

Energy contributors contributed substantial money to the presidential operation and ceremony. After assuming power, the administration has not only enacted pro-fossil fuel regulations but also created benefits and exceptions that favor the field.

Expertise Issues

Alongside industry-linked candidates, the analysts noted multiple administration officials who were appointed to powerful jobs with scant or no relevant expertise.

Those officials may not be connected to oil and gas so closely, but their unfamiliarity is concerning, remarked a researcher. It is plausible to think they will be compliant, or easy marks, for the fossil fuel agenda.

As an example, the candidate to lead the environmental agency’s office of general counsel has very little legal experience, having not ever tried a legal matter to completion, not taken a deposition, and never filed a court petition.

In an additional instance, a White House assistant focusing on energy policy moved to the position after serving in roles disconnected to the sector, with no obvious specific sector or policy expertise.

Administration Statement

One official for the administration dismissed the analysis, commenting that the government’s personnel are extremely competent to implement on the voters’ mandate to expand domestic energy output.

Historical and Current Environment

The leadership implemented a significant array of anti-environmental actions during its first period. In its second tenure, equipped with rightwing agendas, it has overseen a much more extensive and stricter rollback on climate rules and renewable energy.

There’s no hesitation, commented one researcher. Officials are eager and willing to go out there and promote the fact that they are executing benefits for the fossil fuel business, resource sector, the energy business.